The assignment was to review a case study and come up with some conflict resolution techniques.
It is time for Jane Doe’s annual review. These meetings can be short and to the point, but this employee has been working below standards and I have received complaints from customers and staff regarding her unprofessional manner on the phone. Plus she seems argue with her co-workers until they concede that she is right and they were wrong. I have also noticed the other support staff does not go into the break room when she is in it.
I will be delivering the bad news that she either improve or will be let go. Since she is a person that is clearly not afraid to speak her mind I need to acknowledge the potential for a conflict and prepare accordingly. I need to have in writing the company’s productivity standards, job completion log and the customer emails outlining their complaints. I do not plan on dumping this information on her the minute she walks in the door but if she has trouble comprehending why her performance is seen as below standard I can present the documentation.
The meeting has two possibilities. It can either be a session where we work together to find ways of improving her skills or it can degenerate into an unresolved conflict where the meeting becomes the legal requirement prior to terminating her employment. I would prefer the meeting be one where Jane perceives her short comings and is willing to actively correct them.
A second way I can prepare for this meeting is by considering Jane’s point of view. Upon receiving the bad news I should not be surprised if her initial reactions are anxiety, anger or acting defensively. Her defensive reaction could be due to one of three possibilities:
1) She realizes she is doing poorly and sees no solution to correct the problem.
2) She does not perceive her work performance as being below standard
3) She accepts there have been problems but “they are not her fault”
The first scenario could be addressed with a collaboration style solution. Since she recognizes and accepts there is a problem we can both work towards a solution together. According to Shockley-Zalabak the collaboration style “is the most difficult of all styles to use for strategic objectives and tactical behaviors” (2009, p 308).
The other two scenarios share the problem of Jane accepting her faults. Since we will not be starting off eye to eye I will need to engage in communication tactics that can reduce friction and keep our discussion on topic. Three of the tactics are:
1)Describe what can be gained and lost by both parties not agreeing.
2)Reduce the issues in smaller more manageable concerns
3)Express concern for both the facts and feelings.
(Shockley-Zabalak, 2009, p 311).
Lastly, going into the meeting I will need to remind myself this is not a case of me being right and her being wrong and me needing to defend my position. It is a case of these are the facts and what should our actions be going forward. There is a possibility we may not find a common ground. In that case I need to accept that and not take our inability to agree personally.
Shockley-Zalabak, P. S. (2009) Fundamentals of Organizational Communication. Boston: Pearson Education.